Has NYSE's Electronic Trading Model Caused More Volatility?

By An Industry Executive
Aug 2, 2007 at 05:33 PM ET

Contributed by Joseph Saluzzi, Partner and Co-Founder of Themis Trading, an agency only institutional brokerage firm.

Trading on NYSE listed stocks has changed and investors need to be aware of the consequences.

If an average investor were asked, where is volatility greatest—the NYSE or the NASDAQ—most would probably respond that the NASDAQ has more volatility. Up until recently, they were probably correct. A study performed in April 2005 by the US Office of Economic Analysis found that, “On average, stocks experience a significant decline in intraday volatility upon moving from the NASDAQ to the NYSE”.

And why is that? “A major reason…is the role NYSE specialists play,” says the NYSE Euronext’s Web site. “The specialists have an affirmative obligation with regulatory accountability to cushion price movement and dampen volatility. They commit capital to dampen volatility and reduce the impact of institutional orders.”

Since the introduction of Regulation NMS and the NYSE Hybrid market, however, electronic trading has become the dominant method for trading NYSE stocks. Market share by the NYSE on NYSE listed stocks has dropped dramatically over the past year. In the second quarter of 2007, NYSE reported 63% of matched volume in NYSE Listed issues (down from 75% in the second quarter of 2006).

A recent example of this trend of increased electronic trading of NYSE stocks occurred on August 1, 2007. A rumor hit the market around 10:30 am that Beazer Homes (NYSE: BZH) may file for bankruptcy. The stock started to sell off immediately. Within 20 minutes, it plunged 37%, to $8.12 and the entire housing sector (including TOL, KBH and PHM) sold off quickly in sympathy. At 11:30 am, BZH issued a statement saying that the rumor was false. This led to a rally in BZH and the rest of the housing sector, which led to a recovery in the sell off to their pre-10:30 am levels.

If the electronic trading alternative was not available, the BZH specialist on the NYSE would have been more in control. Seeing the imbalance in sell orders, the specialist would have stepped in and committed capital to take the other side of the trade. Or they would have requested a trading halt. By performing either one of these actions, the specialist would have mitigated the initial and unwarranted plunge, and the subsequent spillover to the rest of the sector and the overall market would have been limited.

As a result of a large share of trading on NYSE listed stocks being done electronically, the specialist now has different motivations. The desire to commit capital has been diminished due to the lack of profits being derived from the specialist activities.

To sum up, NYSE stocks are essentially traded the same way as NASDAQ stocks now (except for the opening and closing trades). Investors need to be aware of this change and adjust their strategies accordingly.

About the Author:
Joseph Saluzzi is partner, co-founder and co-head of equity trading of Themis Trading LLC, a leading independent agency brokerage firm that trades equities for institutional money managers and hedge funds.

Mr. Saluzzi is a frequent speaker at industry conferences on issues involving market access, algorithmic trading and other sell- and buy-side concerns. He has provided expert commentary for media outlets such as The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Reuters, HedgeWorld News, CNN Money.com, and Bloomberg. Mr. Saluzzi also has authored articles for Traders Magazine and Journal of Investment Compliance.

Prior to Themis, Mr. Saluzzi headed the team responsible for equity sales and trading for major institutional accounts at Instinet Corporation for more than nine years. He graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with an MBA in Finance and received a Bachelor’s Degree in Finance from New York University.



Topics: Exchanges
»  Weblog Main   |   »  View Entries By Topic   |   »  View Entries By Date



COMMENTS




This is a public forum. CMP Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. CMP Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in the message center do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this forum becomes the property of CMP Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in CMP Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: The Message Center is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




current cover



techweb
Online Communities TechWebInformationWeekLight ReadingIntelligent EnterprisebMightyNetwork ComputingDark ReadingDigital LibraryWall Street & Technology
Byte & SwitchNo JitterInternet EvolutionLight Reading's Cable Digital NewsContentinopleUnStrungBank Systems & TechnologyAdvanced TradingInsurance & Technology
Face-to-Face Events
InteropWeb 2.0 ExpoWeb 2.0 SummitVoiceConBlack HatCSISoftwareEntrprise 2.0 ConferenceGTEC
Mobile Business Expo
InformationWeek 500 ConferenceBuy Side Trading XchangeBuy Side Trading SummitBank Executive SummitInsurance Executive SummitTelcoTVEthernet ExpoOptical Expo
Magazines  
InformationWeekWall Street & TechnologyInsurance & TechnologyBank Systems & TechnologyAdvanced TradingMSDNTechNetSmart EnterpriseThe Architecture JournalDatabase Magazine
 
Research & Analyst Services  
Heavy ReadingInformationWeek ReportsInformationWeek Analytics