|
|
- Personal Background
- Fund Background
- Technology and Algos
- Big Picture
Description of Firm:
TradeLink was founded in 1979. It started as — and remains — a proprietary trading firm. As we progressed, we became more engaged in model building. We recognized that we had excess investment capacity in some of those models, and so we began accepting outside investors under the DigiLog umbrella. We have different kinds of funds that address various interests of ours from an investment point of view. By having a portfolio of funds, we also can provide unique investment opportunities for our clients.
Assets Under Management:
As of Sept. 1, about $700 million across the company, of which $200 million is proprietary investment.
Structure of Trading Operations:
The firm as a whole has about 200 employees based in Chicago and London. We have more than 100 people who are involved in different forms of proprietary trading, along with eight fund managers. And then we have all the people needed to support those operations. For example, 10 people are dedicated to the operational issues involved in managing just our futures fund.
|
Products Offered:
The DigiLog platform hosts a number of entities. The oldest fund is our DigiLog Full Portfolio, which is a futures-based fund. Next is DigiLog Global Equity, which is an equities-based long/short fund that trades in both the U.S. and internationally. Another is DigiLog Constellation, which also is an equities-based fund that focuses on U.S. domestic securities. Next we have DigiLog Fourth Power, which is a very high-frequency, equity arbitrage fund. Then we have the Master Fund, which invests in all of our other funds, plus it provides investors with access to some of the firm’s proprietary trading, which is often too capacity-constrained to be launched as a stand-alone fund. Lastly, we just launched an environmental fund.
Trading Style:
That’s a little difficult to sum up in just a sentence or two, as we are so heavily involved in both the fund and prop world. Our trading styles really run the gamut. That said, we’re very mathematically and statistically focused — both by design and by nature. Our background is in options and options theory, and that filters through everything we do at the firm. We lean heavily toward the systematic in our approach, and any discretionary trading is viewed primarily as an overlay on our systems.
|
INTERNATIONAL TRADING
Does the firm trade internationally?
We now have a large international presence. In our futures fund, we trade on pretty much every exchange around the world — we never close. In equities, more and more we’re placing orders on foreign exchanges, and we see that as something that will continue to increase in importance to us. The reality is that with all-electronic trading — and that’s most of what we do now — trading internationally is now easy.
What are the challenges of trading globally?
It’s just an extension of the same concerns you have when operating every day in the US: Combining 24-hour-a-day trading with all of the clearing and accounting issues, making sure that the software manages everything properly, and at the end of every day guaranteeing that everything balances is always a challenge. But it is quite manageable.
|
Professional Background:
I’ve really only had one job, and that’s been with this firm since the late ’70s.
Day-to-Day Responsibilities:
It’s kind of twofold for me. First, I’m partially responsible for managing the overall risk to the firm. I’m the one who’s supposed to sit back and have a bit of distance from our current positions, and consider possible tail events, when they’re most likely to occur and when those tails are getting a little fatter. I try to devise strategies to protect us from those kinds of events. Second, I was involved in founding the firm, so I feel very protective of its culture. And I fight hard to protect that culture — which is important to all of us.
Education:
I have a law degree and an M.B.A. from Stanford.
Fun Fact
I’m passionate about architecture and I enjoy design and building. I’m a jet pilot with an instructor rating. But mostly, I’m just addicted to this business. One of the reasons is that it doesn’t matter what I read — whether it’s about the weather in Australia or an announcement out of 10 Downing Street — everything has the possibility of influencing what is happening to us and how we will respond. Being engaged at that level and working with spectacular people — how great is that?
TECHNOLOGY
Technology Environment
It’s interesting when you talk about technology — we really don’t want to be in the technology business. We love building models, and we love trading. For us, this is the most wonderful game in the world. But in this day and age, without technology, you’re not going to get very far. So technology is a tool we use to solve problems. We spend millions of dollars per year on technology. We have in excess of 30 people who work in the IT area and another 15 who work in basic model research, with other researchers assigned directly to different fund managers.
Buy vs. Build Strategy
Eighty percent of our technology has been developed on our own. The other 20 percent — the simple stuff — we can purchase off the shelf. Given the complexity of our systems and the variety of activities in which we are engaged, we need an immense amount of flexibility. We have no choice but to build this kind of complex infrastructure ourselves. This is obviously an incredibly difficult process, but at least if something breaks, we know whom to blame.
Who ultimately is responsible for the firm's technology?
I have four partners, and one of them — Jay Twery — is the partner in charge of technology. It’s his job to do the strategic planning required to keep our platform strong.
Use of Crossing Networks and Dark Pools
They are only used in two areas, and then only minimally. I have mixed emotions about the whole area. I suspect that the industry is moving in that direction, but I have a problem with the whole drift. I favor more transparency, and I question, as more orders get filled behind closed doors, whether that serves investors best.
|
 |
ALGORITHMS & BROKERAGE SERVICES
Use of Algorithms
We use them everywhere, from top to bottom. It permeates our entire business. With one minor exception, everything was developed internally. I don’t think that the algorithms are as important as the thoughts or market hypotheses that drive them. People get so wrapped up in the math, the box, the algorithm, that they lose sight of the thinking that makes them work. We write our own algorithms to properly express our thoughts. We start with a clear and verifiable market hypothesis. Then we turn to the math and infrastructure to support the thinking.
Prime and Executing Brokers
We use a lot of them, including Calyon, Goldman, Merrill, Morgan, Lehman, Man, Fimat, SocGen and Fortis.
How do you determine which brokers receive your order flow?
I suppose it’s the same way one decides to do business with any kind of vendor — it always comes down to cost, leverage and, as much as anything, customer service.
|
BIG PICTURE
Biggest trading opportunities for the firm?
I have to say that I don’t really know. For us, looking for opportunity is a never-ending exploration. We are trying to find inefficiencies in a world that’s actually pretty efficient, so we just keep looking. We start with individuals who are asking simple but insightful questions; we add a heap of work to that, and we hope that with a dollop of good luck we end up with something.
Difference between trading for an alternative investment firm vs. trading for a traditional asset manager?
You’re going to have to be innovative, creative and love the game. It also helps if you’ve got some humility mixed in with all of that. However, one could conclude that those attributes are the same ones that lead to success in any area.
What is the most challenging aspect of your job?
Managing effective communications. That sounds like a stupid business school kind of an answer, but most problems for us start with communication issues. When there is a problem, it is critical to get the right people to talk to one another early rather than waiting until resentments build up. Another issue in the communications area is getting smart people who have come up with extremely complex ideas to answer very simple questions. I’m never going to buy into a complicated design if the individual proposing it can’t explain the key ideas that drive that concept at a 10th grade level. We never stop asking ourselves what is happening inside of a market that would explain the inefficiency that we’re trying to exploit. I’m the guy who’s supposed to ask those 10th grade questions, and it’s possible that it’s all I’m capable of.
Major Industry Trend
Looking at the industry as a whole, I’m pessimistic. There always are going to be people and firms delivering real success. But there’s too much money moving too fast in search of something described by a word that I just can’t stand anymore: alpha. And there also are too many people who start with a business idea that is based on managing money instead of being motivated by a love of the game and a passion for investing. For us, it’s not really about managing money; it’s about the trading and investing. Our programs are costly to run, so our real returns come from our investments in the models, not so much the management side. Further, if you have something that you believe in, and it’s for real, you should be the first in line as an investor. And that’s where we want to be. So we end up building models to be investors rather than marketers — which probably explains why we’re such lousy marketers.
Interview Conducted by Randall Devere, Contributing Writer
|